Critical thinking

You use critical thinking skills every day - think about the process you go through when you buy a new piece of equipment, or choosing where to go on holiday. At university you need to use critical thinking skills in your reading, and demonstrate critical thinking skills in your writing.

 
Top

What is critical thinking?

Critical thinking involves reading and writing critically. Reading critically means examining different points of view with an open and enquiring mind, evaluating your own position, and drawing conclusions as to whether a particular point of view is persuasive. Writing critically means presenting your conclusions in a clear and well-reasoned way to persuade others.

When you think critically, you:

  • analyse - break things down
  • synthesise - bring parts together in a coherent way
  • evaluate - make judgements, based on sound evidence
Critical thinking - Hear a student
 
Top

Am I a critical thinker?

[T] [W]

Tip: Ask yourself: What am I expected to believe? What evidence is produced to convince me?

 
Top

Developing critical thinking skills

A critical thinker is enquiring, analytical, and open-minded.

Critical thinkers

  • pay attention to detail.
  • consider different points of view.
  • evaluate their own position.
  • develop an accurate understanding of an issue.
  • identify trends and predict outcomes.
  • consider broad implications and long-term consequences.

A critical thinker will

  • critically analyse the task.
  • identify the author's purpose and position.
  • consider whether the evidence presented is sufficient.
  • identify any flaws in the author's reasoning.
  • determine whether the author's position is persuasive.
  • support an argument with evidence.

Remember: Keep an open and enquiring mind, so you can recognise different viewpoints.

Critical thinking - Hear a student
 
Top

Reading critically

[T] [W]

 
Top

Persuasion and argument

Reading critically is a positive process aimed at identifying shortcomings in an argument in order to build on and improve the ideas presented.

To do this you:

  • identify the author's purpose and position.
  • consider and question the evidence presented.
  • evaluate the writer's argument.

The word "argument" is often associated with fighting. In academic writing, however, the word is used to describe any attempt to persuade. An argument asserts and provides evidence in support of a particular point of view. It can be used to advance an opinion or recommend a course of action.

When someone wants to persuade you to accept an idea they put forward an argument.

Critical thinking - Structure of an argument.
Critical thinking - Structure of an argument: Evidence and assertion

All arguments consist of two parts:

  1. Assertion - The main argument
    The idea or course of action presented

  2. Evidence - Supporting the assertion.
    The reasons given to support an idea or action

For example:

"Donors should be paid for giving blood [assertion] because the extra incentive would attract potential donors [evidence]."

Critical thinking - Hear a student

 
Top

Analysis of an argument

 

Analysis of an argument › Assertion

The assertion is the main idea or course of action presented. All arguments have a minimum of one assertion, and at least one piece of evidence in support. The assertion may appear at the beginning, middle, or end of an argument.

[T] [W]

Tip: Arguments usually take the form assertion because evidence, or evidence therefore assertion

Tip: If an assertion does not contain any supporting evidence, it is an opinion, description, or explanation, rather than an argument. 

 
Top

Analysis of an argument › Evidence

Once you have identified the assertion, you need to evaluate the reasons given to support an idea or a course of action.

Pieces of evidence may appear at the beginning, middle, or end of an argument. Certain words and phrases help to identify the evidence in an argument. For example:

  • because…
  • since…
  • follows from the fact that…
  • is established by…
  • is implied by…
  • the reason for this is…
  • and the evidence for this is…

Remember: Always check that the assertion is well supported by evidence.

Remember: Make sure the evidence is relevant, adequate and current.

 
Top

Analysis of an argument › Assumptions

When presenting an argument, authors often omit information, perhaps because they assume it is self-evident or "common-sense." These unstated pieces of information are hidden assumptions.

If an author's assertion relies on a hidden assumption that is not reasonable, the entire argument is weakened.

Critical thinking - Structure of an argument - Evidence and assertion
Critical thinking - Structure of an argument: The effect of an unreasonable hidden assumption
 
Top

Detecting hidden assumptions

To uncover hidden assumptions you must be able to identify the unstated beliefs the argument relies on. In other words, you must be able to identify anything that has been taken for granted in support of the argument.

[T] [W]

Tip: Every argument contains at least one hidden assumption!

 
Top

Analysis of an argument › Reasoning

A sound argument is based on evidence and logic. However arguments relying on faulty reasoning can be persuasive. It is important to guard against this!

It is helpful to become familiar with some common types of "faulty reasoning".

[T] [W]

Remember: Evidence provided does not always offer sufficient support!

 
Top
Am I a critical thinker?

Look again at the example snippets shown earlier.

Q How would you evaluate each example now?

Q Are there other comments you might make?

 
Top

Critical thinking - Putting it all together

  • Identify the assertion of the argument.
    • Does the author use any emotive or biased language?
    • What is the author asking you to accept or do?
    • Is this belief or action reasonable?
  • Identify the evidence used in support.
    • Is the evidence relevant to the assertion made?
    • Is the evidence from a credible source?
    • Is there additional evidence that would weaken the assertion?
  • Look for missing links between the assertion and the evidence provided.
    • If there is a missing link, is it reasonable?
  • Look for ambiguous words that require more precise definitions.
    • Do any words lack definitions?
    • Are those words used consistently?
  • Does the author compare one situation to another?
    • Are the items alike in the relevant respects?
  • Does the author apply a general principle to a specific case?
    • Is the principle applicable?
  • Does the argument recommend a particular action?
    • Would this action have any undesirable effects?

PDF Critical thinking - Putting it all together (PDF)

 
Top

Critical thinking tips

  1. Keep an open and enquiring mind.
  2. Ask yourself:
    • What am I being asked to think or believe?
    • Does the author have anything to gain by it?
    • What evidence is being produced to convince me?
    • How is that evidence interpreted?
    • Are there other interpretations of the evidence?
    • What further evidence do I need?
    • On reflection, what is it reasonable to conclude?


Emily Arvay with Anne Chirnside and Mary Hutchison. First published April 2009. Last updated April 30 2009.